Help talk:Toolforge/Web/Archives/2015

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive See current discussion or the archives index.

Can't move logs?

Per the instructions, I've tried modifying the ~/.lighttpd.conf from

server.errorlog = "$home/error.log"
server.breakagelog = "$home/error.log"

to

server.errorlog += "$home/logs/error.log"
server.breakagelog += "$home/logs/error.log"

And I just get hit with

2015-08-03 02:03:30: (log.c.166) server started 
2015-08-03 02:03:30: (log.c.118) opening errorlog '/data/project/avicbot/error.log$home/logs/error.log' failed: No such file or directory
2015-08-03 02:03:30: (server.c.1012) Opening errorlog failed. Going down. 

my ~/logs directory does exist, but it seems it's trying to go to '/data/project/avicbot/error.log$home/logs/error.log' ? Is this expected behavior, or am I doing something wrong? #avicennasis@wikitech 02:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

If you mean the section "Default configuration", that is an extract of the corresponding shell script lighttpd-starter where $home will be replaced with the tool's home directory. So in your ~/.lighttpd.conf, you need to use explicit paths (e. g., /data/project/avicbot/logs/error.log) instead.

But your intention cannot be fulfilled: You cannot use server.errorlog = ("Duplicate config variable in conditional 0 global: server.errorlog"), and using server.errorlog += will append the path to the default one and thus not work either.

If you are really committed to putting logs in ~/logs, you could theoretically duplicate the whole web service set up and change the server.errorlog configuration to your liking, but for all practical purposes I would try to make peace with ~/error.log :-). --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 03:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I spoke too soon: If you use a construct like:

$HTTP["url"] =~ "^/" {
        server.errorlog = "/data/project/avicbot/logs/error.log"
}

you can make lighttpd output its log there, but the grid system will create ~/error.log nonetheless. However I would still recommend sticking to the "standard" layout. --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 03:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Ah well. I'll learn to get used to it, it seems. Thank you for the reply, though. #avicennasis@wikitech 07:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)